Wireless vs. In-Ground Invisible Fences: Which Is Better for London Properties?

Wireless vs. In-Ground Invisible Fences: A Complete Comparison for London Pet Owners

If you choose the wrong system, you’ll waste money and frustrate your dog. This breakdown strips the decision down to what actually matters.

How Wireless Fencing Works
Circular coverage, limited control, interference issues.

How In-Ground Systems Work
Fully customizable boundaries, ideal for irregular properties, fewer reliability issues.

Reliability in Ontario Weather
Snow, frost, interference from metal siding, neighbour Wi-Fi signals — explain why in-ground systems outperform wireless.

Property Types in London Where Each Option Wins

  • Old North → smaller, defined lots: either works
  • Fox Field / River Bend → irregular suburban shapes: in-ground
  • Rural Middlesex → large acreage: in-ground only

Training Differences
Wireless requires patience with shifting signal variance; in-ground offers stable training lines.

Learn which system fits your property best.

Leave a Reply